Sharing assessment & grading strategies that help students learn
After studying Assessment FOR Learning pretty intensely for the past few school years, I am now beginning to think that we might do ourselves a favor if we would change some of our terminology. Specifically, I think it's time to stop using the words "grading" or "grade" as often as we do and replace them - at times - with "scoring" or "score".
You don't have to go very far down the AFL road to realize that traditional grading practices often get in the way of our attempts to use AFL strategies. Traditional grade books and grading strategies typically average together all of a student's grades for the grading period to determine a final grade. Therefore, practice assignments such as homework and classwork will have an impact on the student's grade. Since the concept of assigning lots of practice so that students and teachers can receive the feedback necessary to increase learning is central to AFL (see Heart of AFL), averaging practice grades into a student's overall grade becomes obviously problematic. What if the additional practice helps a student learn but also lowers the student's grade? The natural reaction to this problem is for teachers to feel that they should not grade practice assignments. For more on this topic see:
So the philosophy of AFL naturally leads to teachers feeling as though they should not grade practice assignments. This is where Newton's third law of motion comes into play: "To every action there is always an equal and opposite reaction." When students realize that some things are graded and some things are not, they react by asking before most assignments, "Is this going to be graded?" Implied in their question is the idea that if the answer is "Yes" then they will work harder than if the answer is "No". As a result, teachers are reluctant to not grade assignments - even if they agree with the philosophy of practice assignments not lowering a grade - for fear that students won't work hard and, therefore, won't learn as much.
So we're left with a quandary. We don't want to let practice impact the student's final grade but we want students to work on each assignment as though their final grade depended on it. Part of this quandary is of our own making. As explored previously in What we WANT students to do v. What we TRAIN students to do, we wish that students worked for the love of learning but we then use points and grades as a Sea World trainer uses a fish. It's difficult to argue that students should not be motivated by grades when we, in turn, use grades as motivators. We have to find a new way. Perhaps our new AFL philosophy requires some new terminology.
What would happen if we started "scoring" all assignments and "grading" only a few? The term "grading" implies the following:
"Scoring" could be the new tool needed to help us out of our quandary. The difference between scoring and grading is in implication #3 from the list above. Both scoring and grading provide the teacher with feedback and both provide the student with feedback. However, a score on an assignment may or may not be used by the teacher to determine the final grade. Here's how I envision scoring working in a typical AFL classroom:
The point here is that every score counts toward helping the teacher determine a grade. When students ask, "Is this graded," what they really means is, "Does this count?" With scoring, the answer to that question is:
"Yes, it counts. Everything counts. As the teacher, I will be analyzing ALL the evidence - just like a good detective - before arriving at a conclusion (your grade). How it counts could be different for each of you, depending on how you perform, but ALL assignments count."
Scoring satisfies our desire to be AFL-ish:
At the same time, scoring doesn't entice students to fall into the trap of only working "when it counts."
What do you think?
Comment
Scott - Ok, I posted the article as a blog. Thanks for the encouragement.
Great reply, Justin. That would make a wonderful blog post all by itself. I think our members could benefit from reading your article.
Thanks for sharing this, Scott. You and I are definitely on the same page. I wrote an article for Online Classroom journal a few months back that reflects almost exactly what you explore in this post. I call marks what you are calling scoring because I think that it is easier to distinguish between marks (formative) and grades (summative). Click here to see the article.
I have been using this system for about 5 years now and I am very satisfied with it. I have asked students to evaluate this component of my classes too and in general they appreciate it very much. Every class there is at least one student who dislikes it, always because everybody can see everybody else's marks on the Google spreadsheet I publish. I would like to find a way to get around this, have a private link for each student, but that seems like too much work.
I believe that scoring/grading should reflect learning, mastery of lab skills and expanded thought processes..........it is important that the whole grading process in one's classroom be designed to indicate how much a student can do to improve and grow: teachers should not use anytype of grading procedures that will discourage a student but will serve as benchmarks and methods of positive reinforcements.....thus teachers must provide students with different methods of assessment that will meet needs of the diverse student populations..... we need to be creative
I have tried this idea a few times this year, but I know I need to utilize this idea a lot more. It has helped me to see the "score" on practice and compare it with a grade on the quiz or test. I can look at the positive changes that occur when the students engage in more practice which usually leads to better understanding and then a better grade. Unfortunately, I need to figure out how to get more of my students, some of the most unmotivated, to complete the practice!!!
I understand the concept of scoring vs. grading and allowing for growth, which should be reflected in the grade. I also appreciate the school board allowing us flexibility in assigning grades. The problem I see is that a lot of subjectivity can enter into this process, and while we as professionals are qualified to make these subjective/professional judgments, I also see that this will open us up to increased scrutiny and criticisms from parents if they do not agree with their child's final grade and we cannot quantify it in the way that parents are used to.
If you have clear and consistent expectations of your students to complete all classwork, they don't ask if it's a grade because they know everything has importance.
Don't forget that in PowerSchool you can make things not count into the final grade - that way they aren't affecting the average. But you could always tell kids that you'll be using everything in PowerSchool to guide what you end up putting as their final grade.
I tell my students that I'm checking for understanding. It seems to get most students involved. I put a check, check +, or - and sometimes a point value, no more than 5. It doesn't go into my gradebook, but it has worked.
Debbie, Hilda and Rachel, Wondering how this will be reflected in Powershcool? We like feedback the scoring can give. In favor of putting in Powerschool but worth few points.
© 2017 Created by Scott Habeeb. Powered by
You need to be a member of The Assessment Network to add comments!
Join The Assessment Network